Every time I look at the Rheedii wiki entries I am puzzled. It seems to me that the first three photos are not the true Rheedii. To me they look more like Petra in the shade. In the past, Scott has so perfectly shown us that Petra, when grown in shade, can develop beautiful shades of pinks and creams. The shape of the leaves in the first three photos seem less elongated than Rheedii and don't recurve under, not even slightly, at the ends. Anyone else have an opinion on this?